The Australian regime has launched a rigorous defense in the country's highest court regarding its controversial ban on social media usage for children under the age of 16. The high-profile legal battle is being closely watched globally, as its outcome could heavily influence similar restrictive measures being explored by other nations.

During court proceedings, regime lawyers claimed that social media platforms supposedly pose severe psychological risks to minors, including depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation. Officials downplayed the sweeping restrictions, describing the ban as "modest in extent" while dismissing infringements on political expression as merely "indirect." F

The legal challenge was initiated by US-based platform Reddit alongside the Sydney-based advocacy group Digital Freedom Project. The plaintiffs argue that the measure is disproportionate, legally flawed, and directly infringes upon the implied freedom of political communication guaranteed under the Australian Constitution.

Following a two-day hearing, the nation's highest court adjourned, with a final verdict expected in the coming months. A defeat for the Australian regime would represent a major setback for international efforts seeking to implement aggressive age-verification and content-restriction policies.

Source: www.aljazeera.com